Blended learning has received much interest in higher education as a way to increase learning efficiency and effectiveness. By combining face-to-face teaching with technology-enhanced learning through online resources, students can manage their own learning. Blended methods are of particular interest in professional degree programs such as veterinary medicine in which students need the flexibility to undertake intra- and extramural activities to develop the range of competencies required to achieve professional qualification. Yet how veterinary students engage with blended learning activities and whether they perceive the approach as beneficial is unclear. We evaluated blended learning through review of student feedback on a 4-week clinical module in a veterinary degree program. The module combined face-to-face sessions with online resources. Feedback was collected by means of a structured online questionnaire at the end of the module and log data collected as part of a routine teaching audit. The features of blended learning that support and detract from students’ learning experience were explored using quantitative and qualitative methods. Students perceived a benefit from aspects of face-to-face teaching and technology-enhanced learning resources. Face-to-face teaching was appreciated for practical activities, whereas online resources were considered effective for facilitating module organization and allowing flexible access to learning materials. The blended approach was particularly appreciated for clinical skills in which students valued a combination of visual resources and practical activities. Although we identified several limitations with online resources that need to be addressed when constructing blended courses, blended learning shows potential to enhance student-led learning in clinical courses.
Educational Research Report
Students’ Engagement in and Perceptions of Blended Learning in a Clinical Module in a Veterinary Degree Program
R.F. Kelly, BVSc, MSc, PhD, PgCert AP FHEA, MRCVS, is a Lecturer in Farm Animal Practice at Farm Animal Services, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK.
M. Mihm-Carmichael, VS, PhD, MRCVS, is a Senior Lecturer in Veterinary Reproduction at Farm Animal Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G61 1QH, UK.
J.A. Hammond, VetMB, MA, DHPE, SFHEA, MRCVS, is a Senior Lecturer in Veterinary Education at Veterinary Science and Education, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G61 1QH, UK.
Published Online: December 20, 2019
Metrics
Downloaded 263 times
Article History
Published in print: 1 April 2021
Version of record: 20 December 2019
Subscription Options
Top Articles
-
Advance AccessErik H. Hofmeister, Katherine Fogelberg, Bobbi J. Conner and Philippa Gibbons
-
Advance AccessJyme L. Nichols, J. Shane Robinson, Kris M. Hiney, Robert Terry and Jon W. Ramsey
-
Advance AccessKate Hodgson, Douglas Freeman and Marcia Darling
-
Volume: 44, Issue: 1Killinger et al.
-
Volume: 35, Issue: 4Barker et al.
-
Volume: 46, Issue: 3Malone
-
Volume: 47, Issue: 2Armitage-Chan
-
Volume: 44, Issue: 1Winter et al.
-
Volume: 43, Issue: 1, pp. 1-4Royal et al.
-
Volume: 35, Issue: 4, pp. 487-495Barker et al.
-
Volume: 39, Issue: 4, pp. 341-358Reisbig et al.
-
Volume: 38, Issue: 3, pp. 262-269Bok et al.
-
Volume: 44, Issue: 1, pp. 3-8Killinger et al.
Related Articles
-
King and colleagues
-
McCool and colleagues
-
Stavisky and colleagues
-
Bogaerts and colleagues
-
Vega-Garzón and colleagues